SalvoNews blog is no longer maintained here.
Click here to go to our new blog at salvonews.com
Salvo Llp • July 2010
Friday, March 06, 2009
Demolition starts on 100 Brierfield homes
Lorries from Hapton firm Howard Stott Demolition rolled into the area on Tuesday 17th February armed with security barriers. These were used to secure properties on two of the streets, Belgrave Street and Claremont Street, where the demolition will began.
Around 100 old houses below the railway and the Leeds and Liverpool Canal are being demolished to make way for a new housing development under the Government's Pathfinder scheme.
Stone from the houses will be retained and used for garden walls at the new properties.
Pendle Council's housing programmes manager Julie Palmer said the demolition has to be completed by the end of March.
Pendle Today
We'll live and die in these towns . . . "Housing Market Renewal and Elevate have left Brierfield residents to live in and around this slum for years," comments a video from HyperTyper set to The Enemy's 'We'll live and die in these towns'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Featured
Drummond Shaw interviewed in 2008
Hindhead, Surrey UK - DRUMMOND Shaw of Drummonds Architectural is interviewed by Thornton Kay of Salvo in the back yard of his Hindhead, Su...
-
Milton Common, Oxfordshire UK - LONDON Architectural Salvage & Supply Co Ltd, aka Lassco, having spent the last few years repositi...
-
Blue-hued mammoth tusk from the Tamyr peninsular, Siberia, which sold at Sotheby's Billingshurst sale (below) on 26 Sep 06 for GBP£6,000...
-
Above: Photo from BBC News. The 100th anniversary of Thomas Crapper the man who revolutionised the flushing toilet has just passed. The Crap...
Appalling - the entire Pathfinder scheme is a national disgrace. Nothing wrong with these houses, they should have been retained, refurbished and reused. What a waste.
ReplyDeleteRead the SAVE Britain's Heritage Pathfinder report www.savebritainsheritage.org
What a waste of resources, heritage, a total waste of energy demolishing a usable structure which would have taken only a small percentage of that energy to upgrade. When will it sink in to decision makers?
ReplyDelete